Goldman, Pimco load up on mortgage bonds as Crap gets riskier


Some large investors are getting so antsy about corporate crap debt which once-unloved mortgage bonds seem safe in comparison.

Pacific Investment Management Co., Goldman Sachs Asset Management and many others are snatching up bonds tied to subprime mortgages and other home loans made prior to the housing crisis, while promoting speculative-grade company debt. They say crap yields are too low for the risk investors are taking, and securities backed by mortgages — that have gained up to 6.9 percent this year based on Bank of America statistics — offer greater potential returns given the danger.

These switches in portfolios will be the latest sign that a bull market in corporate charge may be losing steam. In the decade following a financial crisis resulting from the U.S. financial meltdown, many investors dialled their exposure to mortgage bonds and bolstered their holdings of corporate debt, which performed well in late 2008 and 2009 and frequently seemed safer. Now, the U.S. mortgage market is showing signs of strength, and at this stage in the credit score, purchasing securities connected to house loans may make sense, even though it might mean giving up some return, investors said.

“Home has legs,” said Mark Kiesel, chief investment officer of international credit at Pacific Investment Management Co, which manages $1.6-trillion (U.S.). “It is the industry we probably have the maximum conviction on.”

Mr. Kiesel said he expects housing prices to value, which will help non-agency mortgage securities, or bonds backed by home loans without government guarantees. If rather home values falter in a mild recession, the securities may still eke out positive returns. Pimco recommended trimming vulnerability to high-yield stocks and bonds and changing to less risky assets like mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasuries in an asset-allocation report this month.

The marketplace for non-agency mortgage-backed securities has shrunk dramatically since the fiscal crisis. There were approximately $800-billion outstanding in the center of 2017, down from $2.8-trillion a decade ago, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.

Bank of America, with another data set, states about 37 percent of these securities are backed by subprime loans. The remainder are supported by additional mortgages payable for government guarantees, such as “jumbo” loans which are too large for U.S. backing. Although some companies have issued these notes in the past few decades, most the securities outstanding were initially sold before the fiscal crisis. “There is lots of demand and decreasing supply,” stated Mike Swell, co-head of international fixed-income portfolio management at Goldman Sachs Asset Management, which has been decreasing high-yield vulnerability in favour of mortgage-backed securities and other structured products. “We think it’ll be much better protected in case volatility picks up and you see risk assets such as high yield do badly.”

Bonds backed by “Alt-A” mortgages, which were often taken out by borrowers struggling to document their income, have gained approximately 6.3 percent annually, and those backed by subprime home loans have returned about 6.9 percent, according to Bank of America, outpacing crap’s 5.5-per-cent profit and investment-grade’s 4.8-per-cent increase. Even bonds backed by comparatively safe jumbo loans have risen 5.5 percent.

Investors are betting on home after years of mortgage having been relatively tight. The absolute degree of mortgages outstanding has dropped since the catastrophe, to $8.7-trillion from $9.3-trillion, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. And U.S. home costs have climbed an average of 45 percent off their lowest rates, making the security for the loans more precious. Mortgage default rates have been decreasing since peaking at 5.7 percent in 2009, based on data in Samp;P Global Ratings and Experian. It struck a postcrisis low of 0.6 percent earlier this year.

In junk bonds, meanwhile, protections for corporate creditors and bond investors have eroded. Junk-rated borrowers generally have less subordinated debt today, meaning that there are fewer other lenders to absorb losses when a provider fails. Debt levels have grown relative to assets, which also weighs how much investors regain if a corporate debtor goes under. With the Federal Reserve climbing down its balance sheet, there’ll be less need for riskier assets like junk bonds, Morgan Stanley strategists said in a note.

Some investors need to hold their noses to convince themselves to purchase non-agency mortgage bonds {}. “There is still a degree of concern that the past is not really the past,” said Eric Johnson, chief investment officer of CNO Financial Group. Nevertheless, he said he has been adding mortgage bonds and other structured products, while cutting his vulnerability to high-yield debt.

Also on the Planet and Mail

Money Monitor: Slimming down Intelligent beta ETFs (The Canadian Press)

No Comments Categories: Investing Tips

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *